贫穷的英文怎么写 _英文

1. 富有的和贫穷的用英语怎么说富有的：Rich，贫穷的：Poor
一、Rich
1、读音：英 [r?t?] 美 [r?t?]
2、意思是：adj. 富有的；富饶的；丰富的
3、例句：
The rich man left his son nothing in the will.
那位富翁在遗嘱中什么都没给他儿子留下。
二、Poor
1、读音：英 [p??（r）] 美 [p?r]
2、意思是：adj. 可怜的；贫穷的；低劣的；n. 穷人
3、例句：
【贫穷的英文怎么写】He was too poor to buy a new coat.
他穷得无法买新衣。
扩展资料
词汇用法：
1、rich的基本意思是“富的，富裕的，富有的”，可指某人很有钱，也可指某物看上去很奢华，给人一种名贵的感觉，即“贵重的，昂贵的，华丽的”，或指某物的储藏量大，即“盛产，丰富，多” 。rich引申可指“丰产的，肥沃的”“油腻的，味浓的”“深的，鲜艳的，深沉的，洪亮的”等。在口语中rich还可指“有趣的，荒唐的” 。2、poor前可加定冠词the而用如名词，表示一类人，意思是“穷人”，可以作主语、宾语，但不能加不定冠词，也不能在词尾加 -s。the poor做主语时，谓语动词应用复数形式。
2. 关于贫穷的英文文章 Global poverty needs a global answerHBS professor emeritus George C. Lodge's idea of a World Development Corporation has been percolating for years—he wrote a seminal article on the proposal in Foreign Affairs in 2002 (reprinted on HBS Working Knowledge).The WDC would be a for-profit organization that would create sustainable improvements in impoverished countries. Lodge advanced the ideas in a January 2006 two-part piece in YaleGlobal coauthored with economist Craig Wilson. The authors also have a book due in May, A Corporate Solution to Global Poverty: How Multinationals Can Help the Poor and Invigorate Their Own Legitimacy, to be published by Princeton University Press.In this recent interview conducted by e-mail, Lodge is hopeful that the World Development Corporation will be formed. He explains why nonprofits aren't the answer to ending poverty and asks that executives look beyond philanthropy to make lasting positive change.Cynthia Churchwell: In your Foreign Affairs article, you shared ideas on first steps to forming a World Development Corporation. What obstacles do you think have prevented this organization from coming into existence? What hope do you have that it will be created in the foreseeable future?George C. Lodge: Bureaucratic inertia is strong. Big organizations do not like change. There is considerable mutual suspicion among MNCs, NGOs, and multilateral organizations. They are all busy doing what they are doing.There are ideological problems as I mentioned: Business and government are supposed to be kept separate and preferably distant. And many agree with Milton Friedman who famously said that the purpose of business is to maximize returns to shareholders and compete to satisfy consumer desires in the marketplace. Government—not business—is supposed to define and insure the fulfillment of community needs. (Of course, Friedman's formulation leaves the manager with two problems: the sum of consumer desires does not necessarily equal community need, and many—perhaps most—governments to not define or fulfill community needs in a fashion that is acceptable to many. Thus business is left with no choice but to do so.)Nevertheless, there is slow and I believe inexorable movement in the direction of a WDC, because it makes sense for all concerned. It will take time but it will happen. Just the other day the CEO of a major MNC decided to take time to get it started.Q: Your YaleGlobal piece mentions Growing Sustainable Business and the Investment Climate Facility for Africa as positive collaborations between business, government, and nongovernmental organizations. Are there other examples that provide hope of continued partnerships such as these for reducing global poverty?A: Yes, there are many. Here are two: DaimlerChrysler some years ago, under pressure from the Green Party in Germany, decided it had to increase the amount of renewable resources it used in the manufacture of its cars. The manager of the company's Brazilian subsidiary decided to make use of locally grown coca fibers for the manufacture of head rests and seats. With the help of Brazilian NGOs and the U.S. government's Inter-American Foundation, he found a community organization called POEMA in the impoverished northern part of the country near Belem where coca grows abundantly. With public sector financial help a joint venture was set up with POEMA, a modern high-tech factory built, and coca plantations developed. Some 5,000 people were employed. Literacy levels soared. Political participation increased. Change had been introduced.The U.S. Agency for International Development has funded initiatives by Land O' Lakes in some twenty-three poor countries. In Albania, for example, Land O' Lakes has organized 8,000 women into cooperatives for the production of dairy products, providing technical support, veterinary services, and the like. While requiring public sector funding at first, these operations eventually become profitable.The WDC would be a center of research and learning about the impact of business on poverty reduction.Q: In what ways could the World Development Corporation be better than other partnerships to improve quality of life and investment climates?A: First, it would provide for a collective approach to poverty reduction. The WDC board of directors would include about twelve of the world's most admired MNCs. In addition, associated companies could be called on to participate in particular projects as necessary. For example, let us imagine a Nestlé dairy operation in a rural area. I 。